Skip to main content

February 15, 2018

From The New York Times (Kristin Hannah on "Who is your favorite novelist of all time?"):
Well, my favorite novel is “The Lord of the Rings,” but favorite novelist? It’s a tossup between Stephen King and J. K. Rowling. I am a sucker for epic, world-building novels with high stakes that are written beautifully and are impossible to put down. Extra points if I laugh or cry. Few authors can do this once or twice in a career. Mr. King and Ms. Rowling are masters at it. I stand in awe.

From The New York Times (Kristin Hannah on "Who are your favorite writers — novelists, essayists, journalists, poets — working today?"):
Besides Stephen and J. K.? I adore Carlos Ruiz Zafón, Donna Tartt, Anne Rice, Timothy Egan, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Haruki Murakami, Joan Didion, Roxane Gay, Jane Smiley, Anne Tyler — and I can’t wait to see what’s next from Amor Towles and Yaa Gyasi.

From The New York Times (Kristin Hannah on "What genres do you especially enjoy reading? And which do you avoid?"):
When I’m writing, I read a lot of thrillers: Michael Connelly, Harlan Coben, Gillian Flynn, Tami Hoag, Lisa Gardner, Gregg Hurwitz, Dennis Lehane. And I’m sure it comes as no surprise that I love big, rich, character-driven historical and contemporary fiction. “The Shadow of the Wind” is probably my favorite novel of the past decade. It’s the one I recommend most often to book clubs. Really the only genre I don’t currently read is science fiction, probably because I read it almost exclusively in my preteen years.

From Harper's:
A seventy-seven-year-old Italian man cries without emotion when he rubs together, or imagines rubbing together, his right thumb and index finger.

From Harper's:
In all the contiguous U.S. states, the food associated with watching TV or movies is pizza, except Mississippi, where it is ice cream, and Wyoming, where it is cookies.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

February 24, 2018

From The New York Times : We are willing to pay a premium for convenience, of course — more than we often realize we are willing to pay. During the late 1990s, for example, technologies of music distribution like Napster made it possible to get music online at no cost, and lots of people availed themselves of the option. But though it remains easy to get music free, no one really does it anymore. Why? Because the introduction of the iTunes store in 2003 made buying music even more convenient than illegally downloading it. Convenient beat out free. As task after task becomes easier, the growing expectation of convenience exerts a pressure on everything else to be easy or get left behind. We are spoiled by immediacy and become annoyed by tasks that remain at the old level of effort and time. When you can skip the line and buy concert tickets on your phone, waiting in line to vote in an election is irritating. This is especially true for those who have never had to wait in lines (whic...
Post a Comment
Read more

February 26, 2018

From The Economist : An equity is a claim on the assets and the profits of a firm; a bond entitles the investor to a series of interest payments and repayment on maturity. Bitcoin brings no cashflows to the owner; the only return will come via a rise in price. When there is no obvious way of valuing an asset, it is hard to say that one target price is less likely than another. Bitcoin could be worth $10 or $100,000. One argument made by bitcoinnoisseurs is that it is a type of “digital gold”. Stores of value are supposed to keep their value; bitcoin, by contrast, is extremely volatile. Its code ensures that no more than 21m coins can ever be created; that sets bitcoin apart from fiat money, which central banks can create at will. Yet being limited in supply is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for having value; signed photographs of Economist journalists are rare but, sadly, of negligible worth. Nor is supply really limited. Plenty of other cryptocurrencies exist. If the...
Post a Comment
Read more

February 27, 2018

From The New York Times : [Steven] Pinker contends that we should not be nostalgic for the economy of the 1950s, when jobs were plentiful and unions strong. A third of American children lived in poverty. Sixty percent of seniors had incomes below $1,000 a year. Only half the population had any savings in the bank at all. Between 1979 and 2014, meanwhile, the percentage of poor Americans dropped to 20 percent from 24 percent. The percentage of lower-middle-class Americans dropped to 17 from 24. The percentage of Americans who were upper middle class (earning $100,000 to $350,000) shot upward to 30 percent from 13 percent. There’s a fair bit of social mobility. Half of all Americans wind up in the top 10 percent of earners at at least one point in their career. One in nine spend some time in the top 1 percent. Poverty has been transformed by falling prices and government support. “When poverty is defined in terms of what people consume rather than what they earn, we find that the...
Post a Comment
Read more