Skip to main content

February 04, 2018

From The Guardian (Hanya Yanagihara on "The book that is most underrated"):
It was (rightly) praised when it was published, but I wish more people who read Wolf Hall would also read Hilary Mantel’s earlier work, which is so nasty, funny and delicious: Every Day Is Mother’s Day? Vacant Possession? An Experiment in Love? All so wonderful. Also, he has a much bigger audience in the UK than in the US, but I do love Jonathan Coe’s The Rain Before It Falls.

From The Guardian (Hanya Yanagihara on "The book I wish I’d written"):
The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro. Though really, there are scores of them. You know you’ve read something special when your blinding jealousy is eclipsed (barely) by admiration.

From The Guardian (Hanya Yanagihara on "The book that changed my life"):
So many. But I’ll say Goodbye, Columbus by Philip Roth. My father gave it to me (he reread it as I read it) and it was a revelation. I didn’t understand much of it – it was probably the first book for adults I read – but even so, I comprehended enough to recognise that it was, in part, a betrayal of the author’s history, even as it was a tribute to it. That was an important early lesson. Much of my early reading was informed by my father and his tastes: together, we read Barbara Pym, Anita Brookner, VS Naipaul, David Leavitt, Vladimir Nabokov, James Baldwin, and, of course, all the great Japanese modernists. And lots of early Roth.

From The Guardian (Hanya Yanagihara on "The book that changed my mind"):
I have never and will never read anything like Autobiography of Red by Anne Carson.

From The Guardian (Hanya Yanagihara on "The book that influenced my writing"):
I don’t know if it influenced my writing, necessarily, but one of the books I return to frequently is Junichiro Tanizaki’s The Makioka Sisters: a near-perfect novel.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

February 24, 2018

From The New York Times : We are willing to pay a premium for convenience, of course — more than we often realize we are willing to pay. During the late 1990s, for example, technologies of music distribution like Napster made it possible to get music online at no cost, and lots of people availed themselves of the option. But though it remains easy to get music free, no one really does it anymore. Why? Because the introduction of the iTunes store in 2003 made buying music even more convenient than illegally downloading it. Convenient beat out free. As task after task becomes easier, the growing expectation of convenience exerts a pressure on everything else to be easy or get left behind. We are spoiled by immediacy and become annoyed by tasks that remain at the old level of effort and time. When you can skip the line and buy concert tickets on your phone, waiting in line to vote in an election is irritating. This is especially true for those who have never had to wait in lines (whic...
Post a Comment
Read more

February 26, 2018

From The Economist : An equity is a claim on the assets and the profits of a firm; a bond entitles the investor to a series of interest payments and repayment on maturity. Bitcoin brings no cashflows to the owner; the only return will come via a rise in price. When there is no obvious way of valuing an asset, it is hard to say that one target price is less likely than another. Bitcoin could be worth $10 or $100,000. One argument made by bitcoinnoisseurs is that it is a type of “digital gold”. Stores of value are supposed to keep their value; bitcoin, by contrast, is extremely volatile. Its code ensures that no more than 21m coins can ever be created; that sets bitcoin apart from fiat money, which central banks can create at will. Yet being limited in supply is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for having value; signed photographs of Economist journalists are rare but, sadly, of negligible worth. Nor is supply really limited. Plenty of other cryptocurrencies exist. If the...
Post a Comment
Read more

February 27, 2018

From The New York Times : [Steven] Pinker contends that we should not be nostalgic for the economy of the 1950s, when jobs were plentiful and unions strong. A third of American children lived in poverty. Sixty percent of seniors had incomes below $1,000 a year. Only half the population had any savings in the bank at all. Between 1979 and 2014, meanwhile, the percentage of poor Americans dropped to 20 percent from 24 percent. The percentage of lower-middle-class Americans dropped to 17 from 24. The percentage of Americans who were upper middle class (earning $100,000 to $350,000) shot upward to 30 percent from 13 percent. There’s a fair bit of social mobility. Half of all Americans wind up in the top 10 percent of earners at at least one point in their career. One in nine spend some time in the top 1 percent. Poverty has been transformed by falling prices and government support. “When poverty is defined in terms of what people consume rather than what they earn, we find that the...
Post a Comment
Read more